Search for: "Rita Doe"
Results 1 - 20
of 649
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2007, 2:23 pm
In Rita v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:38 am
Moreover, though Rita does answer a few key post-Booker questions, the opinions in Rita have passages that present new puzzles for anyone trying to sort through the post-Booker world of federal sentencing. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 9:23 am
Victor Rita. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 10:00 am
There is not a Federal Defender who does not know that aggravating Guidelines factors result in a greater punishments. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 7:04 am
Souter dissenting in Rita v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 3:02 am
In Rita v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:15 am
In May, we reported that a tentative settlement was reached in a case against Anheuser-Busch for marketing its “Ritas” brand of drinks like “Lime-A-Rita,” which did not contain tequila, “Ritas Sangria Spritz,” which did not contain red wine, and “Ritas Mohito Fizz” when in fact it did not contain rum. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
Rita v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:51 am
And that is exactly what beer giant Anheuser-Busch did by introducing the “Ritas” brand of drinks like “Lime-A-Rita,” “Ritas Sangria Spritz,” and “Ritas Mohito Fizz. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 10:23 am
As Doug Berman noted, Rita does not say that the circuits have to adopt the presumption of reasonableness. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 11:10 am
Moreover, as detailed in Part II, though Rita does answer a few key post-Booker questions, the opinions in Rita have passages that present new puzzles for anyone trying to sort through the post-Booker world of federal sentencing. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:00 am
Rita has something for everyone (except Victor Rita) Rita recap ... for now [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 5:58 am
Ironically, the opinion for the Court in Rita did not resolve the one circuit split that the case seemed poised to address, but the opinion does indirectly suggest resolution of two other splits. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 7:05 am
This McGee does not do. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 6:23 pm
MYSTERY #2, Rita opinion at slip op. at 12: "[T]he sentencing court does not enjoy the benefit of a legal presumption that the Guidelines sentence should apply. [read post]
5 May 2016, 8:00 am
Does Moogan Have a Case? [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 10:09 am
Rita received a within-guidelines sentence. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 6:18 am
Thus, I am especially eager to see if this week there are some early rulings from district or circuit courts articulating views about how Rita changes (or does not change) their views of the post-Booker federal sentencing landscape. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 3:14 pm
" So we know that a within-Guidelines sentence is presumed to be reasonable, but how much deference does such a sentence get? [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 8:41 am
" It does not "afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct. [read post]
